Here is another thought experiment for extroprian idealism, which shows the imcompatibility of geobiology with transhumanist ideals:
How similar is building a prosthetic robotic arm for an amputee, designed to interface with their nerves and muscles perhaps, to building the arm of an autonomous robot?
I imagine every principle is completely different and distinct except for perhaps design features. You could make an automoton hand look like anything, but the most natural “transhuman” prosthetic limb would be designed to integrate with existing biology, like the limb it’s replacing.
There is no denything that organic constituents share physical properties with inorganic materials, can interface with them or be shaped by them—we have teeth, hair, waste, and skin that sheds for exactly that purpose.
But a healthy body is a complete system, it is auto-regenerating and its ultimate logic and longevity is intergenerational and interpersonal.
It’s impossible to imagine replacing a part of that system artificially. Even gene editing is a manipulation of organic material, not a replacement of it in the self-replication process.
This is why the fantasy of auto-regeneration often co-occurs with transhumanism—the subconscious fantasy is to simply replicate life. The impulse is Promethean.
