Like my other theories on LLM and psychodynamic translation modeling, some might be tempted to run away with this theory for personal gain. In this instance, it’s a little less straightforward—how would you do it without adapting physical technology to this theory? Perhaps espionage—or outright torture and infinite human rights abuses—was not the best form of advancing your field of study, if that is your purpose in reading this. This and my previous article are published under severe duress.
The Unified Pipeline:
Raw Crystal Tensor (d, C, π, ε)
↓
Green’s Function (Analytical) FEM (Numerical)
↓ ↓
Resonance Frequencies Eigenmode Shapes
↓ ↓
Impulse Response Photoelastic Mapping
↓ ↓
Convolution Kernel Color Shift per Mode
↓ ↓
FAST INVERSE (Real-time) Validation & Calibration
↓
Spectral Shift (RGB) → Sound Pressure
(To be continued. See previous article for context.)
I developed an entire transceiver system to adapt existing encryption in fiber optics cables to this 16 bit per symbol formula of post-semiotics SI-metric informations system, and on paper at lesst you save 93% of energy expenditure.
The premise is skipping semiotic encryption by using tensor SI metrics read from crystal lenses to transcribe relational phenomena through the laws of physics themselves rather than via binary data or even linguistic semiotics.
Here’s a brief 11-part series on the subject via Instagram with math and diagrams for end use applications. More writing to follow.
Originally from my TikTok /theanthropocenejournal (you add the circle a if you want—I will be arrested on sight / on site). (Kidding.)
I’ve been thinking for a while now how to codify a trinary computational language that can incorporate spectral shift as a value between binary (1/0 +/- etc) like the I Ching uses changing lines to encode a multiplier of information.
The problem is that resorting to trinary as a code (2/1/0) still has the character of finite binary definition. The addition of a variable is arbitrary and redundant (it is still binary).
The solution-related to my tensor equation models—is to use spectral shift between to semiotic definitions (you can visualize these as colors for fiber optics purposes, or circles for spaciotemporal purposes) that range between 0 and tau (the infinite numeric value used for the circumferance of a circle).
Any value between these could fall both within true definition (it is not an arbitrary point, it is a value) and used to represent any scale applied where O represents the point of semiotic indistinction (there is no possible value that can be assigned due to absence) to the whole presence of tau representing full definition.
Thus, we do have a system LIKE 1/0 (tau / semiotic indistinction) but with an infinite spectrum between them, limited only by the physical medium of representation.
A switch, therefore, would need to operate on a very sensitive gradient (insofar as possible) and a light spectrum would be limited to wavelength detection ranges between two set limits or between total absence of light and full intensity (a luminosity variable).
I’ve been thinking for a while now how to codify a trinary computational language that can incorporate spectral shift as a value between binary (1/0 +/- etc) like the I Ching uses changing lines to encode a multiplier of information.
The problem is that resorting to trinary as a code (2/1/0) still has the character of finite binary definition. The addition of a variable is arbitrary and redundant (it is still binary).
The solution-related to my tensor equation models—is to use spectral shift between to semiotic definitions (you can visualize these as colors for fiber optics purposes, or circles for spaciotemporal purposes) that range between 0 and tau (the infinite numeric value used for the circumferance of a circle).
Any value between these could fall both within true definition (it is not an arbitrary point, it is a value) and used to represent any scale applied where O represents the point of semiotic indistinction (there is no possible value that can be assigned due to absence) to the whole presence of tau representing full definition.
Thus, we do have a system LIKE 1/0 (tau / semiotic indistinction) but with an infinite spectrum between them, limited only by the physical medium of representation.
A switch, therefore, would need to operate on a very sensitive gradient (insofar as possible) and a light spectrum would be limited to wavelength detection ranges between two set limits or between total absence of light and full intensity (a luminosity variable).
