The sum of much of my analysis is a single conclusion: the Fourth Reich is an asymmetric threat.
One that has remained embedded yet covert in both American politics and greater global alliances’ tacit worldviews since the end of World War II, when the Nazis’ strategy and technology doctrines were disseminated, along with their regime’s
survivors and scientists, into the very state apparatuses that toppled its reign of terror.
The issue is not in looking for hidden keystones of Swastikas, Norse runes, and eugenics ideology hiding in plain sight (however abundant and cultish they might be) but in decoding the landmarks of institutional incorporation and the globalist socioeconomic engineering legacies that were adopted to justify reassimilation attempts – without which Nuremberg would have been its own slaughterhouse.
To date, this threat is latent, ubiquitous, and sublimated through various inroads in the fields where Nazi ideology found itself most at home-defense (particularly in stoking Cold War polarity), demographic engineering (in the fields of media, housing, education, banking, medical science, and civics), and the rise of nearly stateless technological empires that mimick the shells of state corporatism and psychosocial censorship through their impositions of economic necessity and an operative infrastructure dependency.
It is foremost, a rite of IDEOLOGY. It must not appear indespensible, or it will be. That was exactly its model all along.
Elements at the core of the Nazi regime never vanished from the global apparatus of post-industrial praxis. Their open affiliations were simply shamed and sublimated, while certain powers of both the Allies and Axis picked their teeth with the pins of discarded uniforms.
