Documentation of war crimes allegations and requests for assistance with the ICRC (United States and Canada)
Full documentation of EQS ICRC Integrity Complaint bCBshP (I am afraid to redact or summarize this report despite being forced to disclose private information for my own safety).
As usual with WordPress these uploads are slightly out of order, but can be serialized by making sure the top line of text matches the last line of the former screenshot as you’re reading through. If you save or view image numbers you can discern the proper order as well. Apologies for this extra step.
15.08.2026 – 03:53 Created by: Reporter
Continued:
Besides the clear conflict with the rule of law, the entire assault I’ve been facing since at least 2022 is based on the premise of attempting to kill someone strictly by means of emotional and psychological abuse.
This alone is obviously unbearably at odds with international humanitarian law and the basic premises of dignity in conflict—but I fear that there is an insistance on the idea that cumulative damage caused by less than lethal methods somehow does not accumulate to any guilt, so long as enough personnel are employed and law enforcement is barred from intervening that I (as the victim) am left without a paper trail of official recognition or any way to compensate for my losses. It’s simply abuse applied to militancy and perpetrated with advanced technology and heavy funding. The paradigm is unbearable.
The fact that those responsible derive joy from this should be yet another layer of concern for not only my (hopeful) survival but also for its relevance for international standards. This is depraved and childish killing in broad daylight by cumulative means, and some strange insistance on being beyond accountability.
13.08.2026 – 19:24 Created by: Reporter
Complaints of war crimes (perfidy, medical experimentation, cruel dehumanizing and unusual treatment of a civilian by medical personnel in the course of a conflict—presumably undeclared conflict zone based on contested, unilaterally applied “enemy combatant” status—itself a form of force applied to categorize me as a belligerent which I would classify as forced participation in hostilities) sent to the Oregon Medical Board (OMB) and Psychology Board as formal complaints of coordinated malpractice and misdiagnosis. Here is the textual body of the complaint:
This is an urgent submission of narrative complaint involving ongoing, active, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions in regards to medical malpractice and experimentation during the course of civilian treatment during a time of conflict. I am currently in refoulement, and the substance of this report (and all others) revolves around the issue of summary execution, carried out as a medicalized instrument of political, social, ideological, and demographic engineering.
Please consider this report to be of extraordinary urgency.
Sincerely,
Cody Fielder Meyocks
Greetings,
My name is Cody Fielder Meyocks, of Ashland, Oregon. I am writing in regards to a suspected cluster of malpractice regarding my care under both OHP and private insurance / out of pocket health care.
In particular I believe that I have faced weaponized malpractice, possibly justified by federalized covert counterterror strategies.
The weaponization of the medical system targeting an individual would be a violation of not only of the Hippocratic Oath, but also of the Geneva Conventions. In my situation, this would constitute a grave breach—a war crime—due among other aspects to the duration, extremity, and perfidy of the use of the medical profession as a means of covert euthanasia, for all intensive purposes.
I would allege severe, long term, coordinated malpractice involving Options for Southern Oregon at the Bryson Center, OHP’s care coordinators Jackson Care Connect and others which I was signed on to without my knowledge or consent, the county/state Department of Health and Human Services which has denied me fair assessment for disability on the basis of genuine affliction for years, most notably denying me intellectual disability testing and competency / adaptability testing in the broader course of denying me basic standardized medical / neuropsychological assessment and care.
I would allege that a coordinated effort to induce extreme stress was instigated. This likely included the willful affliction of clinical Post Traumatic Stress Disorder followed by lack of competent, beneficent treatment, lack of civil legal protections against aggitating criminality, and an exploitation of the ability to induce extreme environmental stress in a civic environment that invariably follow a permanent change in neuropsychological reactions to forceful reminders of psychologically traumatic material, inevitabily contributing to extreme losses of basic social function and economic stability and wellbeing due to purely environmental factors.
Whether or not this is a credible or verifiable claim is a matter of federal counterterror policy I imagine. Nonetheless, it is a fundamental contradiction of the healthcare system’s avowed beneficence. I have recorded serious attempts at malpractice and harm induction at the local hospitals and urgent care clinics available to me, including Providence, Asante, and Rogue Valley Immediate Care.
I presumed, before suspecting and receiving tacit confirmation of federalized weaponization of psychosocial strategies, that I must have been failing at adaptivity and social function due to psychological or psychiatric conditions, and through my own research attempted to receive diagnosis of ADHD/ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) based mostly on information available online that might have accounted for greater-than-normal disability resulting from PTSD and lack of clinical follow through.
In retrospect I believe that I was having normal, healthy reactions to severe criminal malice (assisted by the state) and a coordinated dispossession of access to equitable assessment and treatment for a debilitating exogenic neuropsychological disorder.
I nevertheless sought diagnosis from Dr. Douglas Col, clinical psychologist, following the claim that NO ONE in Southern Oregon assesses adult ADHD or Autism Spectrum Disorder under the Oregon Health Plan. While I initially hoped that his affirmative diagnosises of ADHD and Autism might relieve me of any state pressure, under the assumption that attacks on someone with compounded developmental disabilities would be highly unethical and oppose or negate any compelling state interest—I found exactly the opposite. The diagnosises seemed to open opportunities for further breaches of my property, civil, and human rights, likely unethical experimentation—under the newfound guise that because I was disabled (although I have never suffered from delusional disorders or from intellectual disability) I was fair game to perform medical experiments on, perhaps due to the lack of international humanitarian protections provided for civilians with congenital birth defects.
I would still allege that I suffer from no neurodevelopmental disorder, and was simply seeking logical, responsible theraputic pathways under conditions of severe environmental stress compounded by PTSD, crime, and coordinated malpractice.
Dr. Col’s diagnostic report contains errors of fact and my standardized diagnostic scores suggest asymmetrical criteria used to meet the threshold of diagnosis for both ADHD and Autism. My scores reflect outlier variables that are almost certainly better defined by other variables, in other words. I have suffered from chronic deperssion from my adolescent years onward, but other than this I never reached a clinical threshold for any complaints or distress or maladaptive behaviors or patterns. I consider myself a well adapted adult who was simply exposed to chronic weaponization of the medical system, legal system, and compounded environmental stressors.
Adult disability services in the region all seemed to route me in a circle of futility where care or benefits from sustaining life-altering damage from PTSD were framed as an oddly non-medical issue repeatedly. My migraines and CT scan were dismissed by local providers, apparently suggesting that I was either not suffering physically or psychologically in any way that clinical medicine was able to treat—all outside actors, possibly working with local, state, and/or federal police, seemed to pressure me into severe compounding crisises with no legal, medical, social, economic, or private remedy.
The reasonable suspicion that this involves federal counterterror strategies is best evidenced by the documented appearance of CIA affiliated psychologist James Elmer Mitchell, who appeared in plain clothes to interrogate me under (religiously-affiliated) auspice that I might be a kind of environmental terrorist, with interest in infrastructure destruction. I told him frankly that this was patently absurd and that I was only interested in constructive, consent-based solutions to social and environmental problems. Nevertheless, tactics severely escalated into criminal menace, sabotage, theft, fraud, felony signals interference, intellectual and real property theft, violations in tandem of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and War Crimes Act, and other grave breaches of both international humanitarian law and US civil law on the state and federal levels.
I have filed fruitless and exhaustive reports with the ICRC (Washington, Hong Kong, Geneva), Congress, Inspectors General, local police, the FBI, INTERPOL, the United Nations (UNHCR), the Joint Inspections Unit for the United Nations, the OMCT, and the DOJ Civil Rights Division.
I have also been informed by local police that false reports have been made by the local community implying that I am suicidal, when this is far from the case—it simply provides a convenient resolution to many years now of grave breaches of the law and the basic function of the medical, civil, and social mandates that uphold the rule of law and the foundations of civil society.
Furthermore my access to perscription medication was systematically frustrated and weaponized at the distribution point (Rite Aid, Ashland) which was located directly adjacent to a defunct US Cellular branch that was purchased by the local police for unknown reasons. Dr. Mitchell implied that he had connections to US Cellular during our interactions, and this may have invoked Palantir-assisted or styled surveillance of my phone and online activity (which amounts to serious academic and intellectual property espionage considering that I am a writer and researcher in the field of psychoanalysis and biology).
My medication was used as a means of frustration of basic, standardized medical care—even though I was forced to pay out of pocket. I recognized that something was deeply wrong when after yet another frustrating two-to-three-day wait for my perscription to become available, I was notified that it was ready for pick up, but then told at the counter that I was being flatly denied its purchase by the pharmacy for no discernable reason. I have never been accused to misuse of medication, for the record. The optics of dismissing denial of medical perscription based on the sensitivity of the medication perscribed negates the entire structure of trust vested in the healthcare system. It was simply another mechanism to induce stress and suffering.
I would allege that this level of asymmetrical infrastructure disruption and misuse of public funds and public trust itself constitutes terrorism—as there is no other comprehensive criminal definition which encompasses this level of destructiveness of basic civil infrastructure to effect political and ideological ends—with the specific intention of terrorizing a civilian population (not only me but anyone else who engages in critical dialogue around important public issues which I have associated with in the academic and social/economic sphere).
Furthermore, the chief of police in my city, Tighe O’Meara, holds a BA in psychology.
My primary concern is addressing and rectifying misdiagnosis and seeking competent treatment that is not designed to endanger and discredit me as an aid to state repression of legitimate civil function based solely on my religious and philosophical affiliations.
This is all a profound injustice already. Please investigate, and council for equitable remedies.
Sincerely,
Cody Fielder Meyocks
13.08.2026 – 00:57 Created by: Reporter
PS. I am uncertain if this is the correct channel to report grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions. I simply compiled here some of the more greivous and heinous violations of many—others are included in my previous reports YxAzqG and 9HbBTc.
I would appreciate the opportunity to speak with a genuine advocate—I seem to be in a type of quarantine where I am functionally disallowed from contacting anyone who is not essentially a spy for US or UN interests, which may overlap in the EU or NATO.
There appears to be a coersive protocol in place as a basic prerequisite for interacting with me at all or even coming into my proximity that anyone who does be briefed on my case somewhat and subject me to coersive control protocols. I live in a completely isolated, engineered, hostile social detainment protocol where my work, communications, diet, and daily activities are not only strictly monitored by subjected to meticulous forms of acute stress aggitation. I am being denied detainment. When I have been detained in the past, mostly as an asylum seeker abroad, I have been subjected to brutal physical and psychological torture and strict isolation. No medical or humanitarian groups seem able or willing to communicate with me or render me aid.
The use of experimental non-lethal weaponry, used for sensory torture, dehumanization, technological/mechanical torture—including severe AI-assisted malware forcing me to spend hours a day for years now to attempt to prevent digital forms of identity theft and intellectual property destruction; and also non-lethal forms of signals (remote/automated) assisted technology and nanotechnology, such as “smart threads” and possibily biomechanical parasites (often spiders and lice have been used as forms of biological attack, and seem to often be able to be activated or agitated as forms of behavior control and punishment). Obviously Palantir and Pegasus style technology is also being used to aid in my acute surveillance and behavioral control regimes. I am unallowed to access authentic legal, medical, or humanitarian aid beyond food assistance.
I would be far better off in jail in some sense, at least having official records and access to regular meals and legal council, although it would also likely mean certain death and ongoing censorship of my writing and research, which has already been subject to confiscation and obsessive attempts at misappropriation.
I have no reason to endure this enormous, clearly astronomically expensive onslaught of tactics and grave breaches. My innermost thoughts and belief structures have been vehemently dissected and every attempt at moving physically to safety is beset by taunting, blockages, interlopers, and physical frustration by the state and its plain clothes proxies.
The goal is a total destruction of my psyche and my sanctity, and my death—these people are insane. I need to know what branch of the military or intelligence community is responsible. I’ve been left with little choice but lawsuit although the insinuation that I should seek civil damages when criminal behavior is openly encouraged and facilitated against me, and I am being forced into poverty to the point where I have been sleeping on the sidewalk in my clothes carrying everything that I own for months on end now—is absolutely delusional. No judge will grant me relief for monetary damages when I am being openly subjected to war crimes on the side of the road by the police in broad daylight, when I am already in refoulement.
I have no equivalent in history to reference in terms of the scale and versatility and meticulous obsession involved in this cruelty. It seems like it is driven by absolute children, bent on wearing me down to nothing through sheer childish sadism and petty insults that disguise the deeper depravity of this torture regime. I have no reason to suspect that I will survive exposure to the elements for another year, deprived of even transport (a vehicle to shelter in for instance—I have had two stolen, sabotaged, destroyed by the police—and had the insurance claims inexplicably denied).
My small business and all its property was ransacked and completely stolen, possibly the property destroyed completely, by the police. My insurance company did nothing despite criminal interference. (Nationwide, Next, Tokio Marine, and John Pepper Locke all traded assessment in a process that denied me consideration for terrorist damages, although I feel I clearly qualify, in a process that exhausted my savings and took months.)
I am already in refoulement.
I am just a humanitarian and independdnt scholar. What possible cause for this brutality could there have been in the first place?
12.08.2026 – 21:34 Created by: System
Thank you. Your report has been submitted.
FCC complaint updates
Continued: Doing a little research on my end has helped clarify the severity of what I’ve experienced (and how unlikely it has been that I’ve survived without emergency legal or medical responses from authorities).
Firstly, I feel certain that there was a premeditated calculus to the weaponization of medical personnel and the application of extreme stress techniques that resulted in clinical PTSD diagnosis (I had to be extremely careful to avoid misdiagnosis during the initial course of malpractice, when government involvement was still vague and only suspected). I feel certain that accurate, beneficent clinical responses would have alleviated my symptoms to the point where I would not have been forced to seek diagnosis for exacerbated difficulties in executive function, hypervigilance, and severe stress response by attempting to incorporate neurodevelopmental comorbidity that, if present at all prior to diagnosis, was clearly subclinical and better defined by a less severe, more common diagnosises (such as anxiety or dysthymic disorder).
Again, the goal (going far back to 2022-2023) was to induce catatonia or psychotic symptoms through malpractice and forced exposure to extreme stress.
This alone constitutes a war crime, especially when perpetrated against a civilian, by doctors in plain clothes, with coordination by police and federal authorities acting under color of office. (The government will not admit this openly, citing state secrets and a pretense of “counterterror” enforcement, I have good reason to believe.)
The escalation in tactics included attempted summary execution and assassination has been followed by a long period of extreme torture and an advanced regime of decfacto detainment through geographical supply chain / shelter / transportation control, communications interference, and denial of fair procedure and protections under law, including International Humanitarian Law in the search for a new country of asylum as a final emergency measure.
Within a paradigm of quasi-public ghost detainment (again, denied access to basic ammenities and privacy while being forced to endure extreme stress and mass criminal activity, assisted by advanced surveillance and illegal weapons systems to induce extreme aggitation and an omnipresent experience of menace and dehumanization, on a daily basis), I have been subjected to the implied disappearance, rape, and murder of my closest friends and relatives whose identities were then replicated at various times using either AI as digital voice / image impersonation techniques, or by state actors adopting their identities as imposters—a claim that the state clearly hopes will sound too preposterous and paranoid to seem credible—and that the ICRC and other authorities will allow to become an acceptable, new frontier in the weaponization of Arfificial Intelligence and state secrecy if they allow for my claims to remain unaddressed and uninvestigated.
Obviously, the state will continue to neither grant or deny me affirmation of deaths caused by a weapons system sesigned to coopt the identities of its own citizens for use in tactical assaults on the cybersecurity frontier. This does not change the fact that they used the tactic as a method of torture to let me know that my friends and family had been punished for being potential nexuses of support for me, and to encourage my isolation to subject me to systematic torture, captivity, and dehumanization with hopes to effect my disappearance and/or “plausibly deniable” murder (summary execution) by the state and its proxy forces, or through sheer attrition of dispossession of my basic rights to property and economic involvement.
Again, this is by no means justified or justifiable by my beliefs, ideology, or associations with any oppositional force whatsoever. I have every reason to believe it is a criminal exacerbation of ideological surpression and unilateral warfare strategies carried to absurd ends by a state whose philosophy was to dedicate forces and funding to a problem it had manufactured in its own dreams of insecurity, which it then had to justify by manufacturing justifications based on secrecy, dubious presumptions, and no discernable threshold of ethical oversight or ostensible threat of conduct whatsoever. I simply can not overstate how benign and normal my life has been, as far as I can discern. I am an independent researcher (dedicated to studies of interest to the field of psychology, philosophy, and biology, which begs the question of why if not espionage for profit my theories have been censored and demonized when they would vindicate my innocence and nonmalfeasance if they were just allowed free publication—I suspect the authorities simply want to launder my research to commandeer a profit and any stolen glory they can from my death, disappearance, or auspice of instability caused by extreme clandestine aggression).
Furthermore, I have repeatedly appealed for investigation into what I have every reason to suspect were legitimate disappearances of my friends and family, not only for solace and vindication of unbearable experience, but because it has been repeatedly implied under threat of starvation that I was being forced to cannibalize their remains, the implication being that they were frozen or preserved specifically to shuttle to any possible public venue for food so that I would have to choose between possibly engaging in cannibalism of my poved ones or of starving. This was a repeated tactic that involved extreme measures of forced associative cognition (they did not ever serve me a limb with my mother’s wedding ring on it, thank god). The tactic is sinister and associative, and implies the shock of the allegation as a double-bind mechanism of forced silence, which is worse for the payche than direct exposure to active, overt horror and aggression I would have to argue. I personally feel a sense of relief when confronted by overt hostility at this point, because the auspice of menace is at least afforded an outlet.
There is no “humane” less than lethal cumulative damage to a person and their integrity designed to wear down their every faculty, touchstone of dignity, and resource for survival. A weaponized hyperreality designed to coerce an individual’s death is simply an elaborate weapons apparatus. Dressing a gun as a toy gun and demanding others call it a harmless trinket while you go on a mass shooting spree would have exactly the same effect.
War crime allegations are DESIGNED to identify and remediate systematic flaws and horrors the application of state force. I am attempting to help avert extreme cataclysm by reporting these attrocities REPEATEDLY. There is no humane justification for keeping these tactics from being publicly investigated and openly mediated and identified. If nothing else, the indulgence in extreme quasi-medical experimentation and its designation as perfidy is the best and only explaination I can offer for my clinical and legal record—although I have obviously been discouraged from pursuing both as they have led to greater danger for both me and those I sought to protect by seeking refuge and transparency with authorities.
One main concern is that I’m being included in a paradigm of euthanasia (and perhaps a render-no-aid policy that is internationally recognized by governments without public knowledge) that is being applied to me through the intentional application of malicious malpractice and misdiagnosis.
Ie. The dominant theory for climate change strategy may actually be population reduction, with international regognition that social engineering can be effected through clandestine means with the failsafe of the Geneva Conventions declining to cover anyone with a congenital birth defect.
However, if I had had a neurodevelopmental disorder (perhaps I have had subclinical symptoms, but I would argue they are better defined by less severe diagnosis and a high IQ) then I would have enjoyed ADA benefits and social / medical assistance from birth, one has to reason. You simply do not invent a lifelong deformity upon a functioning adult and use it to justify their use, carte blanche, as a victim for medicalized torture that clearly constitutes war crimes regardless of their organic neurology.
The cynicism, callousness, hypocracy, and vindictiveness is unimaginable. That doesn’t mean it isn’t real.
People can not easily comprehend the scale of the threat vectors that I’ve identified without imagining them applied to their own lives. The scale of this is both INDIVIDUAL AND GLOBAL.
Like the climate, your house may burn or flood or blow down in shambles under a tornado—you may lose everything and still feel disconnected to the breathing of the planet itself underneath you, that is gasping in avalanches of devastation.
I urge people to ask themselves how they know what they know outside of their own tactile sensory experience today.
Now eliminate your sources of information based on what can and can not be manipulated and falsified by the oligarchy (their control of media and technology corporations) or by authorities (capable of detailed surveillance and able to access and augement data and civic systems as means of “law enforcement” or “emergency response” for instance).
How do you know it’s really your mother calling from a state away? How do you know it’s your boss? How do you know it’s your doctor or car insurance salesman? How do you know what’s in the news is real?
How do you know anything but your own experience is real—once you’ve become isolated and dependent on mediums of exchange and information controlled by a technology sector that does not regard reality itself as primary? Haven’t we all become, at once, if nothing else, PRONE?
The only failsafe against using AI to perpetrate completely silent attrocities like I’m describing-on a mass scale-is long term composite surveillance an/or real time satellite surveillance.
Both would need hard features determining data security and transmission integrity, and insurmountable biocredentials tracking.
We are in a HELL far beyond anyone’s worst nightmares.
I need disclosure from the Joint Inspections Unit or an investigative body capable of verifying claims without bias to their financial impacts. This is a COLLECTIVE danger that I have suffered to discern PERSONALLY. I do not deserve to be the emblematic casualty of its horriffic logic.
Al was not supposed to DIRECTLY REPLACE HUMAN LIFE— in conflict, economics, philosophy, or otherwise.
“It isn’t murder if it doesn’t look like murder,” is a one way track to the deepest, darkest realm the earth has ever comprehended. The IMAGE is not the THING ITSELF. There will be no coming back from that apocalypse of illusion.
There is no justification to placing the wealthy and “authorized” at the helm of perception. They will not be as gracious as reason would implore.
21.08.2026 – 18:58 Created by: Reporter
I want to add the weaponization of Jungian themes of archetypal semiotics and synchronicity are being used as an abusive form of de facto detainment, interrogation, and torture—and have been for years now.
I am uncertain if the prevailing theory is that semiotic scaffolding and coersive psychological abuse under the guise of hyperrealism is supposed to represent an undecipherable medium of manipulation, or perhaps one that is working as a branch of reality itself in a cultish formulation of symbolic essentialism, but the abuse of Jungianism to perpetrate attacks leaves me without any means of response, affirmation, self-defense, mediation, medical attention, or remedy as the state and its proxy agents have repeatedly used this form of cryptographic cover (clearly assisted by AI and medical/surgical abuses as noted here) to interrogate, tortue, and detain me—all clearly with lethal and dehumanizing intent.
I would implore Geneva to initiate a dialogue or interview on my behalf to initiate a remedy of due process or of moves towards safety and rehumanization. It seems clear to me that the instigation of this use of force was either a false assertion of being indiscernable from authentic social reality, and/or a conscious weaponization of potent medical theory as a form of coersive detainment and abuse. This was possibly spurred by my work in this field, but for beneficent reasons and where theories of existential importance are at stake.
I do not consider vindictive hostility caused by subjugating oneself unwelcomed to rhe scrutiny of competing metalogical theories (like breaking into another’s personal study and reading their diary on the nature of religion, and developing a complex about it) to be a credible cause for feeling in any way threatened or victimized.
The danger is a normalization of medical and surgical torture and malpractice where no civic or humanitarian systems can function—or perhaps can pertain to function as arms of demographic control and social engineering without true beneficence.
Anything can be a weapon. Any medical impliment, any access to technology, and any guise of secrecy. I am not an aggressor, I have to impress again, and I never have been. I’ve been experimented on as a victim of cognitive and semiotic warfare simply because I am trying to develop the field in positive directions that may stain the conscience and grandiosity of state actors bent on cultish essentialism around their chosen weapons and fields of authorization.
Please initiate remedies and discourse on my behalf, again. My only options are to suffer immense indignity under the guise of my captors’ innocence or to allow myself to be unwillingly provoked into a humiliatingly futile attack where I will be framed as delusional and left to suffer twice more for the aggression of the state against its own citizen—all without warrant or probable cause, much less declaration of war against me as an individual, or on my work, beliefs, and religion, as far as I can discern.
21.08.2026 – 19:15 Created by: Reporter
Postscript on my prior message.
One must assume that the perpetrators of these attacks are misappropriating medical knowledge, philosophy, and technology to perpetrate attacks under guise. My strongest claims to perfidy involve active malicious practice of medical personnel acting under cover of their theraputic capacity—but the massive, transnational scale of this medium of attack implies a far more general misappropriation of medical knowledge for the purpose of psychosocial and surgical (cognitive) warfare.
This paradigm MUST be openly defined and mediated. If it is a possible weapons system that is capable of violating the Geneva Conventions not only by its widespread application but by its very nature—the danger to civilian populations through the weaponization of the medical field and of civic institutions and infrastructures could be cataclysmic and existential.
21.08.2026 – 19:53 Created by: Reporter
I want to note that no medical / communications medium (arguably what Jungian weaponization is outside of inflicting harm) is intrinsically pathological or prone to abuse. It can serve a relatively benign (or one could even imagine theraputic) purpose and still be no replacement for authentic social reality or environmental/cognitive wholeness.
I should note that I can intuit maliciousness in the weaponization of Jungian mediums just as one could with any exchange—but one does not need intuition when it comes to real damage to one’s person and their rights to freedom from malice.
I want to note that on my way into Switzerland for the first time, on a commercial plane from Seattle to Zurich, in my first attempt beyond repeated attempts on the Canadian land border to claim asylum, one of the plane engines seemed to smoke and stop functioning on our way into the airport—an attack vector I was familiar with as a victim of extreme cyberattacks and advanced drone warfare.
This not only put me and the entire civilian population on that flight in potential danger, it prevented me from trusting in the beneficence of international protections and the integrity of national borders and international law as such.
I refrained from reporting this to Swiss authorities because I assumed that any attacks on a commercial flight would have been documented and investigated at levels far surpassing those appropriate for assessing attempts on my life alone—but in retrospect this was foolhardy. I simply feel too small for what I’ve been subjected to beyond my control.
That may have been an undocumented breach of airspace and an act of international terrorism. I’ve experienced in the past a mixture of drone warfare and localized cyberattacks that could have accomplished this kind of disruption on multiple commercial airlines, in personal automobiles, and notably once on a passenger train between Guadalajara and Mardid / Atocha in Spain, where I did try to alert authorities after I pulled the emergency lever, when I realized that smoke resultimg from suspected cyberattacks effecting the mechanical systems was not recognizable to other civilians or perhaps the operator of the train.
I believe the intention was to cause serious civilian casualties as a form of targeted killing of me as an individual, using civic infrastructure as a weapon.
I wish that I had the opportunity to clarify this earlier, but one does not anticipate this scale of hostility coming from level of affairs in their own personal lives, in a small town in Oregon.
21.08.2026 – 20:29 Created by: Reporter
Postscript.
I maintain that it would have been cheaper to buy a bullet.
I had no defense that prevented summary execution using traditional methods of state violence.
Furthermore, I had already reported similar attacks to US authorities, Inspectors General, and to the United States Congress—with extreme difficulty and with direct attacks aimed at my life, I should add.
I also reported to the UN (UNHCR Special Procedures) prior to the attacks on civilian infrastructure in Spain. There should have been no precedent for allowing innocent lives to be put in danger.
This is a highly formalized weapons system that is relying on the presumption that it is immune from identification. It may be a paradigmatic response to improvised weapons technology and transnational organized terror, but the artifice itself is anything but a proportional and sane response or deterrance strategy, one has to presume, if it subsumes all of civic reality as a weapon, and degrades the very borders, commercial systems, and citizenries it was designed to protect against rogue attacks.
I refuse to die as a victim of artiface. I would prefer a traditional execution with at least the fascimile of due process and habeas corpus attached as prerequisites. I will submit to detention at any time.
Regards.
21.08.2026 – 21:36 Created by: Reporter
In synopsis:
This report details both advance forms of perfidy and methods and frameworks for advanced informations systems weaponization.
These tactics sound theoretically harmless, until you consider the transfer of data governing the transmission of thrust between an engine and transmission or drive line—just for instance.
The entire global economy and all its moving parts are now mostly governed by some form of data transfer.
Data technology does not just toggle nano-scale binary switches on silicon boards and servers. It also writes the laws of engineering and momentum for civilian infrastructure on a mass scale—one that includes individual identifiers and the implicit threat of mass surveillance and its weaponization in the form of social engineering practices.
This is the tactical domain of the Network State movement.
UPDATED REPORT TO THE JOINT INSPECTIONS UNIT OF THE UNITED NATIONS (the J.I.U.)
Updating report submitted
December 09, 2025 00:47 UCT +8
Greetings,
I am following up on a complaint regarding neglect of duties and failure to respond to war crimes allegations and urgent assistance / evedenciary preservation requests to the UNHCR. I submitted my prior report in late December, 2025 and have not received a response, however I am still in de facto detainment and being subjected to extreme censorship, perfidy, torture, and denial of due process and/or habeas corpus.
I wanted to draw the JIU’s attemtion to further reports to the ICRC’s EQS Integrity Line, and further reports to the House Oversight Committee in Government Reform, which appear to be the only viable options I have for directing reports and complainrs regarding ongoing summary execution attempts to official bodies.
My ICRC EQS Integrity Line complaints are:
bCbshP
YxAzqG
9HbBTc
I made a report and intervention request to the IACHR which has remained without response, besides verbal phone confirmation that video made public does indeed depict CIA torture psychologist Dr. James Elmer Mitchell:
112043
My initial request to the ICRC (Hong Kong) requesting help determining whether my close family and friends had been killed or disappeared as casualties, and subsequently impersonated using artificial intelligence technology and/or advanced identity theft techniques (which received no response and almost certainly preceded more casualties of close friends and loved ones, which might have been prevented) was:
WES3442
My last UNHCR Special Procedures Report, for reference again, was:
k13wtiha
And my OIOS report was:
OIOS2026/25
The only official responses I have reveived from the ICRC have been confirmations of transmission of my reports, case closures, and an email response from Veronique Huguet (vhuguet@icrc.org) stating the following:
Dear Mr. Cody Fielder Meyocks,
Thank you for contacting the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
We regret to inform you that we cannot undertake any action in favor of your request, as it does not enter within the competence of our organization. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) provides protection and assistance to the victims of armed conflicts, as stipulated in the Geneva Conventions from 1949.
We regret not to be in a position to assist you in this particular request and we thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
The ICRC Team
International Committee of the Red Cross
Regional Delegation for the United States and Canada www.icrc.org
[End ICRC email]
Multiple calls to the Washington desk of the ICRC requesting a safe passage interview and reporting perfidy have let me with no response other than this generic email.
I believe that the weaponization of medical personnel (perfidy designed to force me into suicide, cause permanent and/or severe psychological and/or neuralogical damage, or cause extreme distress to effect death by incidental causes) is the primary violation of the Gemeva Conventions being covered up by ongoing government-backed censorship and repression tactics amounting to summary execution, going back to 2022 at least. However there are multiple grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and violations of the War Crimes Act (18 USC 2441) that have accumulated a substantial variety of unresolved criminal violations of both national and international use of force and/or rule of law treaties and legal codes that ensure the protection and humane treatment of civilians in times of conflict.
Most concerning for me currently are ongoing attempts to force me into lasting poverty while subjecting me to property destruction and blockades to economic participation and intellectual property protections. I believe this constitutes pillage in addition to summary execution, based on the immense value of my ongoing work in the philosophy of language, the anthropology / neuropsychology of semiotics, the field of psychoanalysis, the origins of homo sapien symbolic cognition (which I refer to as crypsis theory), and my theory of crystalline abiogenesis (liquid polymer crystalline abiogenesis, or what I call geobiology theory—a theory on the origins and nature of life on earth).
This is in addition to censorship, surpression, and surveillance of all my digital, physical, and creative writing activities, including destruction of my works both on and offline, forcing me to rely with great hardship on printed media and underground pressings which may serve to unintentionally confirm state bias against me as a dissident, whereas I am simply seeking desperately to preserve my life and my life’s work.
Other valuable contributions include theories on non-semiotic AI/computation using tensor equations, fiber optic cable optimization, etymological intercultural AI modeling, and other valuable contributions to the sciences and humanities of the modern economy.
I am carrying everything I own and have barely managed to survive. Attacks are ongoing and being denied recognition by police or by the state. I continue to be denied beneficent medical treatment (malpractice seems to be the rule for me when I seek remedy), and I have had my musical instrument repair store pillaged while seeking sanctuary in Mongolia, where there were documented attempts to kill me through exposure—I have been denied insurance settlements and the benefit of all other state and private protections against losses and indignities incurred by organized criminal or terrorist activity.
I am still waiting for any response, investigation, assistance, or guidance, as my communications are likely being filtered and destroyed, or subjected to malicious cyberattack and network interference—including to emergency personnel, which in the United States constitutes a felony.
I appreciate your ongoing consideration of these grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and of US civil and criminal law. I repeat that I am and have been in refoulement perpetrated by multiple national authorities since July, 2024–including Canada, Norway/Ireland/Denmark (who seemed to work together), Hong Kong, and Switzerland.
I am still urgently requesting a resettlement / protection interview or any other substantial investigation / protection of my person and work, as the substance of the issues at stake are clearly more compelling than my biological life alone.
I would implore a response.
Thank you.
Cody Fielder Meyocks
DOB 02/14/1989
