I want to add a further dimension to this complaint that may go beyond the scope of the FCC’s consumer mediation role, but which is essential to understanding the context here. This regards what is probably some of the most advanced abuse of consumer technology to be documented to date.
In 2024 I came under severe cyberattack along with multiple other forms of serious threat to my life, limb, and property, that were absolutely calculated and executed in large part through my cellular devices and the data they both produced and received.
I have filed multiple federal complaints and whistleblower reports urging investigation and remediary action, none of which have come to fruition whatsoever.
As a result of these attacks I was forced to flee the country, after which I became a refugee (from my perspective) and both subjected to and (one would hope) protected by the applicable laws, including my initial protections and rights as a citizen which have been functionally ineffective but in principle fully intact.
To be as brief and transparent as possible, I believe that in order to attempt to gain control of my identity and telecommunications technology, Mint Mobile and other technology, telecommunications, and consumer service providers (including but not limited to Apple) may have—to the best of my completely sober assessment—conspired to gain control of devices and phone lines linked to the one in question (702-526-2507) through family sharing features (particularly my mother and fathers’ old phones and phone lines, which were related from the time I was an adolescent and shared Apple registrations, likely, since some of my devices were hand-me-downs—702-525-6700 and 702-521-1218).
I frankly believe that my parents were impersonated to effect this, likely through advanced technology-assisted disappearance and/or clandestine murder, although I have nothing but circumstantial evidence to that regard. (This would align with the levels of authority implicated by my reports and possibly related my parents’ proximity to a military base in Yakima, Washington—the Yakima Firing Center.)
In short, I believe that parental control features have been leveraged by authorities with control of my parents’ technology, identity credentials, and other secure identifiers such as in-person and digital access to their bank accounts, one of which I was on as a joint owner and whose closure (and ongoing impersonation of my mother, as I would allege) deprived me of access to at least $50,000 and has rendered me financially and vicariously technologically dependent on said abusive authorities, through their apparent control of the devices and identities of my (presumably missing and/or deceased) parents.
This sounds outrageous, delusional, and conspiratorial to degrees that would strain the imagination of what could be credibly feasible theough extreme malice and advanced access to technology and artificial intelligence—but it is POSSIBLE, REPORTED, AND YET TO BE DISPROVEN, at least to my satisfaction.
Since I presume complicity and cooperation with police in Yakima, Washington (and beyond) ranging to high enough levels of federal authority to effect a cover up, I have come to regard to Red Cross as the appropriate authority for determining whether my family members (and friends) have been casualties of political violence. I have been attempting to document their alleged disappearance with the Red Cross and the United Nations since December, 2025–which has resulted in no official action or relief from direct interference with my identity and telecommunications by the devices and phone lines in question (I have every reason to suspect) allowing for back door network errors and illicit surveillance and algorithmic control of me and my devices.
This appears, to me, to be a cross-company effort, likely orchestrated for political and religious / philosophical repression purposes, including but not limited to espionage for theft of trade secrets, scientific research, original writing, and other forms of property theft.
To that regard I will share this recording made between me and someone whom I believe to be impersonating my mother, Renee Meyocks. (I have been forced to undergo an extended frustration of the grieving process, obviously, so I attempt to call this character Maw.)
This recording alone will furnish no definite proof of this claim, but for me this issue is absolutely central to understanding the underlying motives and criminal elements that might motivate Mint Mobile and other private technology firms (along with federal, state, and local authorities) to deny me the basic reciprocity of market relationships as a form of consistent, cumulative abuse—as indicated by my dealings here with Mint, which are myopic and merely indicative in their lone circumstances.
Here is an audio recording which I believe illustrates enough inconsistency and details which contradict reality (including in relation to banking communications) that it should warrant further investigation and consideration.
The failure of Mint to provide resolution to this request alone is simply a man-in-the-middle and denial of service attack with much larger implications and repercussions for whistleblower retaliation and civil rights / consumer protections than it may initially appear to represent.
https://archive.org/details/new-recording-35
Serious technical / network interference is also well documented beginning in 2024 and specifically relating to attempts to contact the Office of the Inspector General for the Central Intelligence Agency and other federal oversight authorities,
Respectfully,
Cody Fielder Meyocks
