Greetings,
This is a new report regarding an ongoing threat of perfidy and state-aligned malicious use of the medical system and medical knowledge to harm, detain, and potentially kill a United States civilian in the United States, who is also in refoulement.
I am that citizen. This targeting is supposedly politically motivated, but undermines the rule of law, qualifies as espionage, and constotutes grave violations of the Geneva Vonventions as outlined in the 1949 Conventions.
My previous ICRC EQS Integrity Line complaints are:
bCbshP
YxAzqG
9HbBTc
I made a report and intervention request to the IACHR which has remained without response, besides verbal phone confirmation that video made public does indeed depict CIA torture psychologist Dr. James Elmer Mitchell:
112043
My initial request to the ICRC (Hong Kong) requesting help determining whether my close family and friends had been killed or disappeared as casualties, and subsequently impersonated using artificial intelligence technology and/or advanced identity theft techniques (which received no response and almost certainly preceded more casualties of close friends and loved ones, which might have been prevented) was:
WES3442
My last UNHCR Special Procedures Report, for reference again, was:
k13wtiha
And my OIOS report was:
OIOS2026/25
I wanted to specifically voice a disturbing addition to my previous reports, which detail medical experimentation and the malicious use of advanced biotechnologies—in particular neural/brain and sensory organ monitoring and interface technology that appeara to have been designed for clandestine use, possibly in the intelligence service. I believe this BCI-field technology has been deployed in me in a weaponized form and may be the justification for invoking privileges related to state secrecy, as addressing me medically may be considered a disclosure risk, or liable to breach trade secrets or state secrets law and/or contractual obligations for either private individuals, public officials, or state/punlic interests.
I wanted to write to state explicitly that I believe some kind of weaponize BCI or BCI-field (Brain Computer Interface, or Brain Computer Interface with an added “field” of censory and nerve interface) is being used to augment specific factors of my perception, likely by using remote intrusion of nano-scale neurosurical technology, possibly with biotechnology and biometrics as parallel methods of human experimentation.
This is being executed in public as well as in detention, likely with the assistance of advanced telemetry, drone, and/or data aggregation surveillance (in the styles of Pegasus and Palantir).
I will detail more later if I have time. I wanted to remark upon the remote neurosurgical augmentation of my field of awareness—which besides breaking more laws than I can comprehensively illucidate, unquestionably violates multiile sections if the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the U.S. War Crimes Act.
Details regarding this and other grave violations were submitted to the UNHCR Special Procedures webform portal, and also to the JIU (Joint Inspections Unit of the United Nation). Further reports to U.S. Congressional reprrsentatives Wyden and Bentz (of Oregon), the CIGIE (Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Ethics (and/or Efficiency)) repkrts in 2024/2025, and multiple Congressional Committeesa and law enforcement authorities (including the Ashland, Oregon police Department, the Oregon Medical Board, the Ashland, Oregon police department, the Jackson County, Oregon sheriff, and the FBI.
oyFWAw
20.10.2026 – 01:29 Created by: Reporter
Let me please add, as a matter of record:
I am a direct descendant of the American Revolutionary War against the British colonial monarchy, and I have already spent $120,000 that I inherited of the farmland granted to my ancestors for their service in the Civil War trying to survive and revive my dignity while being subjected to years of unilateral onslaught.
The tactics involved here are a generalized degradation of my dignity. I am not allowed to seek privacy, I am not given the benefit of custody and a fair trial, I have been forcefully deprived of my right to defend myself or reaort to arms to defend my home and my belongings, and I have been denied the right to escape and to seek asylum in another country who is obligated to consider my claims under treaties regarding the rules of war.
I have no desire, nor have I ever had a desire, to engage in conflict with anyone—least of all the entire national apparatus, as it seems to presume is an appropriate framework to authorize my personal repression and dehumanization. I have found myself espousing rationalist and liberal values at a time where democratic society in the United States has become estranged from these principles and subject to mass conformity at the expense of the individual, and their sacred right to self-determination and autonomy as guaranteed by the law (which was hewn from this land by the sacrifices of my own ancestors).
I don’t invoke war and conflict because I have any interest in it—but because that is the duty of the ICRC, and I understand what is at stake here for not just the United States but also for its global standing and the welfare of its allies.
If someone wants to attack their own countrymen—someone who by all available evidence already controls the economy, the legislature, the medical system, the borders, the police and federal investigative bodies, the armed forces (by election or loyalty I can’t tell), the intelligence services, and the communications and civil infrastructure—and they want to do so not only from a place of total impunity, and immunity from the scrutiny of their fellow countrymen and women, and to effect a dignified individual’s deprivation of their rights, livelihood, and ability to either escape, surrender, or fight—I am in disbelief that there is not some simple, peaceful enough measure available to call them off an individual or mediate a diplomatic conversation for public scrutiny in some way that does not grant one total control of every means of testing their philosophy of barbarity against a completely helpless opponent, while granting the other the thankless task of trying to reinstitute the laws and customs that are supposed to be enjoyed by not only me but all people in the territory because of the very sacrifices of my family to this principle.
There is no rationale for a secret war against one man, that defies every principle of the U.S. constitution, the rule of law, the Geneva Conventions, and any common sense measure for the principle of courage and earnestness when attempting to deprive another fully grown human being of their hard earned life.
I’ve simply become the brunt of a festering cowardice that wishes to proclaim itself a king from the shadows while braying from behind a fortress wall at any little glimpse of sunlight that makes it onto their frail skin.
If someone wants to fight their own countrymen to institute a monarchist system of governance, then they should resort to arms, public discourse, political office, or social change movements and rhetorical literacy like any decent sabateur. Instead, they’ve been given access to the entire superstructure of civilization to hide behind like a cloak in front of their dagger, all while endlessly taunting, haunting, and berating me as a wounded tycoon would to their last servant on a sinking ship—except I am not a servant and if I had to choose between dying like a stray animal being put down by medical authorities abusing their position, or by police and federal authorities abusing theirs, and fighting back—I would fight back, given that I have been cornered, denied escape, restitution, justice, or retreat from their aggression. There’s simply no excuse to torment an individual under the pretense and guise of goliath impunity:
They apparently already have the power they are seeking in every realm, except (a) they lack moral authority, and (b) they are trying to deprive me of my intellectual contributions (which, as detailed elsewhere, include important theories in the origins of life, on the philosophy and biology of symbolic cognition, and on the existential significance of the individual and their role in the cosmos and in the anthropocene, among other things) because they lack accomplishments that are comparable, and having intruded onto the work of their self-proclaimed political and philosophical enemy (myself) uninvited, and with me unaware, they were exposed to work in many fields and sciences to which they clearly feel entitled bylut have no air of significance other than a snide presumption of superiority, and perhaps some vague notion of the “law of the jungle”—when I can’t even steal a banana from the local market as though my superior strength to it and my cunning to place it in my pocket entitles me to the spoils.
Someone is clearly convinced that the system they are likely sworn or self-proclaimed to represent simply does not apply to them.
There is so much pathetic averice in this unilateral assault that I have to say, simply for my own dignity, that since your offices have been unresponsive to my pleas as a civilian and refugee—or as a medical, religious, or cultural practitioner (I consider myself both in a unique, independent sense)—then please at least preserve for the record that I am not the beast to this nation that I was born to and that I call home, and that I have made no claim on anyone else nor their property, rights, or territory—I have scarcely enjoyed the birthrights of my own citizenship myself, before this assault began.
But I will not allow for history to let a treasonous coward with only hubris in their conscience to escape without me stating plainly that I would rather fight a clearly stated and demarcated, uniformed representative of themselves, and their stated life-or-death philosophy which they have staked THEMSELVES to against me in particular, although I am an individual devoid of any organizational affiliations—than to endure the ruse of civil society played out as a voyeuristic trap of depravity, divested of any conceivable honor or merit.
I would like, more than anything, to either understand why the state (and apparenty the ICRC) have divested me of rights provisioned to all people in their jurisdictional mandate, and also to understand why I am being effectively euthanized with my full knowledge, and without even the possibility of individually identifying, and attempting to reason with, an opponent who has plenty of resources—clearly—to survive a simple public debate or argument, no matter how they conceived or misconceived their position.
It is simply untenable to think that I will suffer a compliant death through hedonistic torture without avenging myself and my lived ones at some point. I would not avail the ICRC or federal authorities of their responsibility to prevent undue suffering and to ensure the preservation of rights and the rule of law under their observance. If this IS a federal authority acting alone, with no backdoor, I would expect a fair trial and a chance to defend myself with my words, please.
I don’t suspect that you have ever taken a long, hard look at yourself if you don’t see the injustice in my statement here. I would rather die with honor and dignity that live forever as a cowardly parasite, and that is exactly what make me and my secretive assailant different kinds of men, if they are a man.
20.10.2026 – 02:28 Created by: Reporter
Furthermore,
Since my intention here is to enter my statements into the only available public record that I feel may preserve them with some earnest dignity whether I am a victim of unbearable cruelty or I somehow restore myself to justice—let me state some things for posterity.
Some individuals are happy enough to growl of their own volition, to enrich themselves and their loved ones and their communities with their little lives of labor and dedication and craft, and to stay with what is truly and dearly their own in the world.
I am one of these people. I am an individual, and by that I mean that I am indivisible in my dedication to my own labor and the fruits of my life as a biological, self-structuring organism, which I will allow no one to violate or misconstrue the wholeness of.
Others earn their merit through depriving others and preying off their work like a mosquito off the back of an ox, and have nothing at all to show for their own living but what they have deemed themselves entitled to from the tables of others. I have traveled the whole world seeking refuge from such parasites who lie out of full view of the human conscience, and everywhere I have learned that the law says one thing, and favors my rights as an individual—and does another completely, and conspires to sell rights to my very body like it were a product off the shelf. I have never seen this law written, nor judged anyone who who subject themselves to its logic and remain a whole, noble human, capable of managing and constructing their own affairs,
Whoever has embittered themselves against me is revialed that no matter how much they gather to themselves, they have in fact earned none if it—they have simply stolen it against the threat of black veils and slight of hand and thick smog and cities left in ruins. Their whole empire of persona is simply plunder, where a simple weed on the roadside had more character of the democratic individual that they will every bear or dream to know.
I see no other types of people, to be honest, when I look around, and I don’t believe that I am wholly alone.
Further, since authorities have seen fit to disappear the bodies of my family and dear ones (I know they have, I won’t beg this time) and to have paraded their images and voices before me like shadow puppets meant to mock how meaningless and worthless these same authorites judged their sacred lives—they have seen fit to disappear them into the structure of stone and wires and wood and asphailt and the landscape itself, I will see it until I am granted the dignity of their proper burial as a vast tombstone.
I see every stacked stone and laid wire and bare stretch of ground between as the ediface of testament to their lives, since the authorities have seen so fit to vanish them into it and to leave me with only some haunted mechanics of their vestigial images, rather than the proper grief of their corpses.
I am speaking of Marlana Mae Bright, Renee Meyocks, Mark Meyocks, Madison Meyocks, Gary Reinhart, and Kirk Tierney (whose ashes at least were left, but whose voice was better at the poetry of daily life and religion that any other I have ever known, and was stolen by these same cowards I speak of to simply taunt me via phone call against all human decency). Other, I presume, have fallen and vanished for the sick dream and desire to merge the machine with their spirit and flesh, and in so attempting not both could appear at once, so their lives were destroyed to make way for the flashing of light and the hum of electric air—which is now everywhere like a gravestone.
So this architecture that we call civilization, and the very landscape it inhabits, was deemed by the authorities to be the vessel of their disappearance. (I did not deem it so, they made clear that this was the intention.)
And since my loved and dear ones have vanished into the walls and wires and streets and winds of cities and nations everywhere, I simply wish to state that I find them of sacred belonging to my dead until they are separated and given rest, burial, and justice.
When the machine and its silent harbor on this planet relinquishes the bodies and souls and voices of my dead, then I will give (in my own eyes and my mind) the ediface back to the no one it belongs to in particular, as it tends to outlive the individual, and it belongs to the mortal.
If my loved ones are as immortal as the machine, it is their sacred urn to me. I will treat it with as much need for respect and sanctimoniousness as any gravestone or restingplace. This is not about property, it’s about the veracity of claims, and the dignity of belonging somewhere you have been placed away from arm’s reach of the living.
Until they are relinquished, every stone and wall and wire bears to me their holy image, name, and memory.
I find this to be a just solution, for the time being—I wish, rather, that they could be remembered as they really were instead.
I apologize that, as usual, the gallery here may not preserve the correct order of the screenshots. I am simply including, as usual, to verify that what is written here is what was submitted to the ICRC, and that they did verify receipt of the report.
Update. 10/23/26
